Cases 1 - 10 of 24
THEODORE v. PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024mc00011
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. THEODORE
Defendant:
PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MICHAEL OTWORTH, MICHAEL E. DEE and others
Respondent:
HINDENBURG RESEARCH, LLC
USA v. Damone Oakley
as 23-3101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAMONE D. OAKLEY, a/k/a Alex Logan, a/k/a Officer Alex Logan, a/k/a Officer Victor Creed, a/k/a Officer Stan Valentine, a/k/a Dee Dimes
Wheeler v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01641
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc., Virginia Boulet, Michael Dee and others
Han v. Otworth et al
as 1:2021cv01569
Plaintiff:
Han Byung-Gook and Byung-Gook Han
Defendant:
Michael Otworth, Richard Brenner, Tanya Burnell and others
Nominal Defendant:
PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
Konder et al v. Culkin et al
as 1:2021cv00391
Defendant:
Andrew Hamer, James A. Graf, Anand Gopalan and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jordan and David Kondner
Nominal Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re Velodyne Lidar, Inc. Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv00369
Defendant:
Christopher A. Thomas, Andrew Hamer, James A. Graf and others
Nominal Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter D'Arcy, David Kondner and Brandon Jordan
USA v. Dee Downs
as 21-1081
Defendant / Appellant:
DEE LAWRENCE DOWNS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Barrett Lhu Partnership et al v. AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01894
Plaintiff:
The Erik Poulsen Estate, S&D Partnership, Linda Clark and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC
Intervenor:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CLINE v. AKRON BILLING CENTER
as 1:2019cv09166
Plaintiff:
Dee Ann Cline
Defendant:
AKRON BILLING CENTER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
