Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bonanza v. County of Oneida et al
as 9:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Bonanza
Cross Defendant:
County of Oneida, Oneida County Correctional Facility, ABC Corporations and others
Defendant:
Oneida County Sheriff's Department and CBH Medical, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lopez v. 1st Def NYS Superintendent et al
as 2:2019cv06806
Defendant:
1st Def. NYS Superintendent and 2d Defendant New York St - Def NYS
Plaintiff:
Ligio Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagoner v. Ciocca
as 18-1766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tina Lynne Wagoner
Defendant - Appellee:
Stephen Ciocca, Cellino and Barnes, Troy Westfall, Salamanca Police Officer, Tina Owens, Salamanca Police Officer and others
Defendant:
Daniel Piccioli, Catt. Co.Deputy Comm. DSS, Adam S. Kemp, Officer Salamanca P.D., John Doe, Editor Director NDYFS and others
Lopez v. 1st Def. NYS Superintendent et al
as 2:2017cv00544
Defendant:
1st Def. NYS Superintendent and 2d Defendant New York State- Def NYS
Plaintiff:
Ligio Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. 1st Def. NYS Superintendent et al
as 1:2016cv09631
Plaintiff:
Ligio Lopez
Defendant:
1st Def. NYS Superintendent and 2d Defendant New York State- Def NYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Stewart et al
as 1:2016cv02375
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., Blackout Entertainment and DoeBoy Entertainment
Defendant:
Sakir Stewart, Island Def Jam South, Island Def-Jam Universal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABC v. DEF
as 1:2009cv07229
Plaintiff:
ABC
Defendant:
DEF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
