Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Dempsey v. Raley's et al
as 2:2022cv01507
Plaintiff:
Joyce Dempsey
Defendant:
Raley's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dempsey, et. al. v. Raley's
as 2:2022cv01506
Plaintiff:
Joyce Dempsey and Sylvia Redding
Defendant:
Raley's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dempsey v. Raley's et al
as 2:2022at00896
Plaintiff:
Joyce Dempsey
Defendant:
Raley's and DOES 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dempsey et al v. Raley's et al
as 2:2022at00895
Plaintiff:
Joyce Dempsey and Sylvia Redding
Defendant:
Raley's and DOES 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
James Aftosmes et al v. Town of Hingham
as 1:2022cv10314
Plaintiff:
James Aftosmes, Cameron Allegra, James Arena and others
Defendant:
Town of Hingham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Norma Delgado Molina v. Dempsey's Adult Care Homes, LL, et al
as 22-15176
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NORMA DELGADO MOLINA, in her individual capacity
Defendant / Appellant:
DEMPSEY'S ADULT CARE HOMES, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company and RUTH DEMPSEY WOODS, a proprietor and statury agent
Dempsey et al v. Raley's
as 2:2021cv02354
Plaintiff:
Joyce Dempsey and Sylvia Redding
Defendant:
Raley's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Dempsey et al v. Raley's Inc
as 2:2021at01221
Plaintiff:
Joyce Dempsey and Sylvia Redding
Defendant:
Raley's Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dempsey v. Raley's et al
as 2:2021at01181
Plaintiff:
Joyce Dempsey
Defendant:
Raley's and DOES 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dempsey v. Raley's et al
as 2:2021cv02300
Plaintiff:
Joyce Dempsey
Defendant:
Raley's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
