Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dempsey v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv03156
Plaintiff:
Dylan Dempsey
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Warden D. Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
3H202 L.L.C. v. Phlight Pharma, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00274
Defendant:
Alvix Laboratories, LLC, Phlight Pharma, LLC and Dempsey Levi
Plaintiff:
3H202 L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
3H202, LLC v. Phlight Pharma, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Alvix Laboratories, LLC, John Does 1-10, Phlight Pharma, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
3H202, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dempsey v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 3:2018cv00822
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Charles Dempsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. Pennington et al
as 3:2018cv00502
Defendant:
Charlayne D. Hall, Mary Dempsey and Richard Pennington
Plaintiff:
James Ferguson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bias v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Orlando James Bias
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Norris Hogan, K. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Barry Lemax Melton
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Ray Rice, T. Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrothers v. East Mississippi Correctional Facility Employees
as 3:2016cv00982
Plaintiff:
Antonio Carrothers
Defendant:
East Mississippi Correctional Facility Employees, Mary Dempsey, Unknown Abangon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. May et al
as 3:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Benny McCalip May, Evelyn Fairley, Management Training Corp., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hogen et al
as 3:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
Scooter Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Unknown Hogen, Unknown Thomas, Ray Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
