Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
David Love v. Inspector Michael Morales, et al
as 23-11089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LAMARR LOVE
Defendant / Appellee:
INSPECTOR MICHAEL MORALES, JOHN DOE, CHAD WOLF and others
Williams v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 9:2023cv80480
Plaintiff:
Chekeria R. Williams
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Marqus Williams, Celeste Y. Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gerow v. Newsom et al
as 8:2022cv02976
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, California State Senate, Toni Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evgeny Ryzhov v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 22-13499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVGENY RYZHOV
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Caudle v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
