Cases 1 - 10 of 14
JONES v. STATE OF MISSOURI et al
as 1:2022cv01238
Petitioner:
BOBBY LARRY JONES
Respondent:
STATE OF MISSOURI and DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GRIMES v. ROY et al
as 1:2017cv01559
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
SETH MATTHEWS, SHREVEPORT POLICE OFFICER, AMI CLEARLY-TROMBLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01756
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HIRSCHFIELD v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2011cv01826
Plaintiff:
DANNY JOE HIRSCHFIELD
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEFFERIES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2011cv01159
Plaintiff:
NARDYNE JEFFERIES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , VINCENT GRAY , DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH REHABILITATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
YANCEY v. ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2010cv01953
Plaintiff:
ANGELA L. YANCEY
Defendant:
ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
