Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03375
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Young Yil Jo v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2024cv02440
Petitioner:
Young Yil Jo
Respondent:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Justin Yool Oh v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2024cv02431
Petitioner:
Justin Yool Oh
Respondent:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Son Oswald Cesar v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2024cv02433
Petitioner:
Son Oswald Cesar
Respondent:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jin Hee Yi v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2024cv02430
Petitioner:
Jin Hee Yi
Respondent:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clara Cortez v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2024cv02435
Plaintiff:
Clara Cortez
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02346
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wenjuan Zhang v. Secretary of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv01734
Petitioner:
Wenjuan Zhang
Respondent:
Secretary of Homeland Security, Director of USCIS, Director of USCIS Los Angeles District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cuixiao Zhang v. Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Petitioner:
Cuixiao Zhang
Respondent:
Secretary of Homeland Security, Director of USCIS, Director of USCIS Los Angeles District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jieri Leng v. Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jieri Leng
Respondent:
Secretary of Homeland Security, Director of USCIS, Director of USCIS Los Angeles District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
