Cases 1 - 10 of 27
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv01783
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, State of Alabama, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv02026
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01997
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF ALABAMA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv00679
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LORETTA E. LYNCH, JOHN WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2014cv02228
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
United States, Eric H Holder, Jr, PROPST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Lavell Williams v. State of Alabama
as 2:2014cv01514
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2014cv01296
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., PROPST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01366
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick Lavell Williams v. State of Alabama
as 2:2014cv05224
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Williams v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2014cv03992
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
