Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Mays v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2015cv00898
Defendant:
Rick Benitez, Brian Bishop, Larry Blanton and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Burl Mays, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olmstead v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2015cv00093
Defendant:
Department of Oregon State Police, Deschutes County and Jane Doe(s)
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Olmstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davidson v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2015cv00052
Defendant:
Caren Burton, John Burton, Deschutes County and others
Plaintiff:
Martie Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Richard Samuels v. Deschutes County, et al
as 14-35349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SCOTT SAMUELS
Defendant - Appellee:
DESCHUTES COUNTY, DESCHUTES COUNTY SHERIFF, Blanton, TORY FLORY, Deputy, personally and individually and others
Wilson v. Deschutes County et al
as 3:2014cv00251
Defendant:
Deschutes County and Jane and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cason v. Blanton et al
as 6:2013cv01605
Defendant:
Larry Blanton, Deschutes County, Scott Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Cason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00832
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
240) 358-0424 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00657
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
