Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 626
Glaude v. Deutsche Bank AG, et al.
as 24-1339
Plaintiff: DONALD GLAUDE
Defendant: DEUTSCHE BANK AG, COMMUNITY REALTY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., also known as Victor Marr and VMM IRREVOCABLE TRUST
C. v. Rashid et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02056
Defendant: Jamal Rashid, Caesar's Entertainment, Inc., Mally Mall and others
Plaintiff: C. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Tera Group, Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.
as 24-135
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERA GROUP, INC., TERA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and TERAEXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: CITIGROUP, INC., CITIBANK, N.A., CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. and others
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Public School Teachers Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago v. Bank of America Corporation
as 24-81
Petitioner: PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT FUND OF CHICAGO, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
Respondent: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Michael Pearson, et al v. Deutsche Bank AG, et al
as 23-13475
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL PEARSON, ANDREW CHILDE and ANNA SILVER, and ANNA SILVER on behalf of and solely in their capacities as Joint Official Liquidators of Diversified Real Estate Development Ltd (in Official Liquidation), GMS Global Market Step Up Note Ltd (in Official Liquidation), Preferred Incom
Defendant / Appellee: DEUTSCHE BANK AG, DEUTSCHE BANK LUXEMBOURG S.A. and DEUTSCHE BANK (SUISSE) SA
Michael Pearson, et al v. Deutsche Bank AG
as 23-13327
Plaintiff / Appellee: MICHAEL PEARSON, ANDREW CHILDE and ANNA SILVER
Defendant / Appellant: DEUTSCHE BANK AG
McCarthy, et al. v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., et al.
as 23-3458
Plaintiff / Appellant: LISA MCCARTHY, MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, KEITH DEAN BRADT and others
Defendant / Appellee: INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., ICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION LIMITED and others
Defendant: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC and THE NORINCHUKIN BANK
New Mexico State Investment Council v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00606
Defendant: Morgan Stanley Capital Services, LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: New Mexico State Investment Council, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico and New Mexico Educational Retirement Board
In Re: Credit Default Swaps Auctions Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund et al v. Deutsche Bank AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10462
Plaintiff: Ohio Carpenters' Pension Fund, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103 I.B.E.W. and San Bernardino County Employees' Retirement Association
Defendant: Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. (f/k/a Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank U.A.) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re: Credit Default Swaps Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013md02476
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Societe Generale S.A., UBS Securities L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff: LBBW Asset Management Investmentgesellschaft mbH, Delta Onshore, LP, Delta Offshore, Ltd. and others
Interested Party: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Not Classified By Court: Silver Point Capital Offshore, Ltd., Silver Point Capital Offshore Master Fund, L.P., Silver Point Capital, L.P., and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Natixis Financial Products LLC and Nomura International plc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?