Cases 1 - 5 of 5
TIAA, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 21-1390
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT INGRAM, COLLEEN GOGGINS, DR. ARI S. KELLEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY LOCHRIDGE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON, together with and on behalf of the Tucson Supplemental Retirement System, TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUNITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, TIMBER HILL LLC and others
TIAA, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 21-1324
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT INGRAM, COLLEEN GOGGINS, DR. ARI S. KELLEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAURA POTTER, CITY OF TUCSON, together with and on behalf of the Tucson Supplemental Retirement System, TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUNITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMBER HILL LLC
TIAA, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals, et al
as 21-1218
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT INGRAM, COLLEEN GOGGINS, DR. ARI S. KELLEN and others
Defendant:
VALUEACT HOLDINGS LP, VALUEACT COINVEST MASTER FUND LP, VALUEACT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMBER HILL LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON, together with and on behalf of the Tucson Supplemental Retirement System, TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUNITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION 481 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN AND TRUST and others
In Re: Constar Int'l Inc
as 08-2461
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMEESH BHANDARI and RANDOLPH REDSTONE
Plaintiff:
CROWN CORK & SEAL
Defendant - Appellant:
CITIGROUP, RP, DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC., JP MORGAN SECURITIES and others
Not Party:
PILOT ADVISORS, SUSAN XANDERS, THOMAS B. HARMON and others
In Re: Constar Intl Inc, et al
as 08-8020
Plaintiff:
AMEESH BHANDARI and RANDOLPH REDSTONE
Defendant - Petitioner:
CONSTAR INTL INC, CHARLES F. CASEY, WILLIAM G. LITTLE and others
Not Party:
PILOT ADVISORS, SUSAN XANDERS, THOMAS B. HARMON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
