Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dew Beauty Inc. v. Tula Life Inc.
as 1:2022cv09534
Plaintiff:
DEW BEAUTY INC.
Defendant:
TULA LIFE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Seaton v. K. Dew Realty Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv08192
Plaintiff:
Kevin Seaton
Defendant:
K. Dew Realty Corp. and Eric Chan
Gomez v. K. Dew Realty Corp.
as 1:2019cv03143
Defendant:
K. Dew Realty Corp.
Plaintiff:
Francisco Almonte Gomez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Mack v. Hall et al
as 9:2018cv00875
Defendant:
Jessica Jayasena, Barry Hall and Sarah deWing
Plaintiff:
Charles Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Hall et al
as 6:2018cv06474
Plaintiff:
Charles Mack
Defendant:
Barry Hall, Jessica Jayasena and Sarah deWing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOWWEE GROUP LIMITED, et al. v. HAOQIN, et al.
as 1:2017cv09893
Defendant:
LITTLE_SUN, LOVEBEAUTY66, FASHION CHINA SHOES and others
Plaintiff:
WOWWEE GROUP LIMITED, ABC, WOWWEE CANADA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Contextlogic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1501
Amoruso et al v. Mr. Septic, LLC et al
as 7:2017cv07874
Plaintiff:
Daniel Diaz, Jonathan Amoruso, Thomas Brink, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Mr. Septic, LLC and Douglas Eherts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones et al v. New York City Housing Authority
as 1:2017cv03683
Defendant:
New York City Housing Authority
Plaintiff:
Jock Matthews, Dana Patterson, Steve Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
McMillian v. Dewell et al
as 9:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Defendant:
Jay Vickers Dewell, Doctor Dew and Alice Hyde Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
