Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ArrivalStar S.A. et al v. BDP International, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv06645
Plaintiff:
ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited
Defendant:
BDP International, Inc., DHL Express (USA), Inc., McCollisters Transportation Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Novogroder Companies Inc The v. DHL Express (USA) Inc
as 2:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Novogroder Companies Inc The
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA) Inc and DHL Express (USA) Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dorman v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dorman and Christopher Dorman
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc. and Consolidated Terminals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fritz v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00086
Plaintiff:
Paul Fritz and Paul Fritz
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc., W&A Cargo Management, Inc., Nathan White and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. DHL Express (USA) Inc
as 3:2007mc00157
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA) Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
