Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
TROUPE v. LOWE et al
as 5:2021cv00344
Plaintiff:
JAMES OLIVER TROUPE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BRENT LOWE, JACKSON DEFORE, RAYMOND DICKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00223
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dickey v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv00124
Plaintiff:
James Dickey
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Askew et al v. The Southern Pan Employee Stock Ownership Plan et al
as 1:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
Bobby Askew , Porter Butler and Joseph McDuffie
Defendant:
The Southern Pan Employee Stock Ownership Plan, American Structural Concrete, LLC, Ken Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dickey v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
James A. Dickey
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Postma v. Southern Pan Services Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan et al
as 1:2015cv03435
Plaintiff:
Timothy Postma
Defendant:
Southern Pan Services Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Ken Dickey and Jeremy Cantrill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Curtis v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Eugene Curtis
Defendant:
Malcolm Jones, Marcus Dickey, Markisha Ruffins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
