Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Directv, Inc., a California corporation v. Richardson et al
as 1:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Directv, Inc., a California corporation
Defendant:
Dan Richardson, Chris Everette and DC Entertainment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Directv, Inc., a California corporation v. Richardson et al
as 8:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Directv, Inc., a California corporation
Defendant:
Dan Richardson, Chris Everette and DC Entertainment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Directv, Inc., a California corporation v. Moriatis et al
as 1:2011cv02271
Plaintiff:
Directv, Inc., a California corporation
Defendant:
Nicholas Moriatis and Logos Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Directv, Inc, a California corporation v. Glauda
as 3:2010cv00704
Plaintiff:
Directv, Inc, a California corporation
Defendant:
Deborah A. Glauda
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal
Directv, Inc., a California Corporation v. Witkowski et al
as 3:2009cv00564
Plaintiff:
Directv, Inc., a California Corporation
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Witkowski and GOAL LINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Greg Masters v. Directv, Inc., et al
as 08-55825
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREG MASTERS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
Defendant - Appellant:
DIRECTV, INC., a California corporation, DIRECTV MERCHANDISING, INC., a Delaware corporation, DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, LLC, A Delaware limited liability company and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Directv Inc v. Blackburn, et al., et al
as 06-4330
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECTV, INC., a California Corporation
Defendant:
MATTHEW BLACKBURN
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN TURK
Directv, Inc. v. Webb, et al
as 04-56847
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIRECTV, INC., a California Corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
SCOTT WEBB
Defendant:
SUPHAMAI BUNNAPRADIST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
