Cases 1 - 7 of 7
COOK v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 1:2016cv00191
Petitioner:
DAVID THOMAS COOK
Respondent:
KEVIN KAUFFMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CRAWFORD, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCDANIELS v. WINSTEAD et al
as 2:2011cv05679
Petitioner:
AUDREY MCDANIELS
Respondent:
WINSTEAD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CRAWFORD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEONHART v. PA BOARD OF PROBATION/PAROLE et al
as 1:2009cv00269
Petitioner:
DAVID THOMAS LEONHART
Respondent:
PA BOARD OF PROBATION/PAROLE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREY v. LAWLER
as 1:2009cv00257
Petitioner:
PAUL GREY
Respondent:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CRAWFORD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2009cv00176
Petitioner:
MAURICE E. SCOTT
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YUNIK v. HARLOW, et al
as 1:2008cv00304
Petitioner:
JAY V. YUNIK
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YUNIK v. SLOWITZKY et al
as 1:2007cv00232
Petitioner:
JAY V. YUNIK
Respondent:
PAUL SLOWITZKY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
