Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Motlagh v. Utah Attorney Generals Office et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Niki Motlagh
Defendant:
Utah Attorney Generals Office, Sean Reyes, Salt Lake City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joseph Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Utah, Deputy District Attorney Office, Sim Gill and others
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Salt Lake County District Attorneys Office et al
as 2:2021cv00577
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Reid, Sr.
Defendant:
Salt Lake County District Attorneys Office, Sim Gill, Melanie M. Serassio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bramhall v. Cyprus Credit Union et al
as 2:2019cv00477
Plaintiff:
Earle E. Bramhall and Earl E. Bramhall
Defendant:
Christina P. Ortega, Jared W. Rasband, Steven C. Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torgensen v. Gill et al
as 2:2018cv00816
Defendant:
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, Cortney Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Torgensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Knighton et al
as 2:2011cv00750
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Miller
Defendant:
FNU Knighton, Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, Lohra Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington et al v. Salt Lake County et al
as 2:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
Garry Pennington , Judy Pennington and Tyler Pennington
Defendant:
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, Lohra L. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumhall v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2009cv00837
Petitioner:
Earl Emmett Brumhall
Respondent:
State of Utah, Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, Third District Court Salt Lake City State of Utah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
