Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
as 24-7065
Plaintiff:
Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia Board of Elections
Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
as 24-7050
Plaintiff:
Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia Board of Elections
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff:
DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
AYELE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv01785
Plaintiff:
MEDHIN AYELE, STEPHANIE CARRINGTON, SHAWN DARNELL CHEATHAM and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SHIRLEY KWAN-HUI, SHARON LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALL et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
as 1:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
STACIA HALL, RALPH CHITTAMS, SUZZANNE KELLER and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Amicus Curiae:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW and WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lana Renna, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANA RAE RENNA, DANIELLE JAYMES, HANNAH SPOUSTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her official capacity as Director of Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Lance Boland, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANCE BOLAND, an individual, MARIO SANTELLAN, an individual, RENO MAY, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND and others
WASHINGTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
EDWARD D. WASHINGTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae:
The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner:
Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Sam Silverberg v. DC, et al
as 22-7133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sam Silverberg
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, Muriel Bowser, Mayor, Donald Sullivan, Vacant Building Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
