Cases 71 - 80 of 2,281
WINSTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv03832
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN WINSTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and KATHLEEN LANDERKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv03342
Plaintiff:
JESSE MICHAEL WALL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JUDGE J. ANDERSON, JUDGE WINGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
GREGORY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03443
Plaintiff:
MS. CHE' GREGORY and CHE' GREGORY
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DC GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Religion
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cato v. District of Columbia
as 1:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Avery Cato
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7132
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Edward M.R., et al v. DC
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward M.R., by and through his Parents, T. R.-M. and E. M.
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
