Cases 31 - 40 of 2,718
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MCNAIR et al v. HEALY et al
as 1:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE MCNAIR and JAMES MCNAIR
Defendant:
THOMAS HEALY, SUASAN BORECKI, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRELL v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
LORI E. TERRELL
Defendant:
CHERYL R. BAILEY, LAURA A. CORDERO, ZABRINA W. DEMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
JAMIE DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00329
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
ARLIE SESSION and NO PARTY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
SESSION v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
ARLIE SESSION
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
G.L. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
G. L., Gary Le, Vanessa Le and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00237
Not Yet Classified:
TRAMAINE NEWSOME and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
