Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Cokley v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Cokley
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Snider, Captain Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DITORO et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2023cv01960
Plaintiff:
Charles Ditoro and Dorothy Ditoro
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DITORO et al v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2023cv14012
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DITORO and DOROTHY DITORO
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anthony Cokley v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-14084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY COKLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHARLOTTE CI WARDEN, FROST and others
Jeffrey Lagrandeur v. A. Najjar, et al
as 22-13797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR
Defendant / Appellee:
A. NAJJAR, Correction Officer, N. OLVERA, Sergeant Corrections, J.S. ROBERTS, Sergeant Correction Officer and others
Lagrandeur v. Najjar et al
as 2:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lagrandeur
Defendant:
A. Najjar, N. Olvera, J.S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cokley v. Dixon et al
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Cokley
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Snider, Lt. Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Hall et al
as 2:2021cv00693
Petitioner:
Joshua A. Davis
Respondent:
D. Hall, Derek Snider, J. Dawson and others
Defendant:
Lieutenant Z. Ditoro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Ditoro et al
as 2:2021cv00561
Plaintiff:
Kacy Joseph
Defendant:
Z. Ditoro, M. Frost, FNU Rolon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowden v. Frost et al
as 2:2021cv00452
Defendant:
D. Edwards, J. Marshall, O. Estrada and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
