Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Prouty v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2020cv00052
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, SCI Wardern Richardson, NCLI Warden 2016-2018 and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Prouty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mbugua v. State of Wisconsin DOC
as 2:2019cv01461
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin DOC
Petitioner:
Mr. Gitan Mbugua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grissom, Terrance v. Evers, Tony et al
as 3:2019cv00765
Defendant:
Warden W.C.I. Foster, Gov. Tony Evers, Dir./Sec. DOC Kevin Carr and others
Not Yet Classified:
WCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Terrance Grissom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinley Bey, La Ron v. Manlove et al
as 3:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Tony Meli, HSU Manager Stadtmueller, WI DOC Medical Director and others
Plaintiff:
La Ron McKinley Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stull, Brandon v. Mahoney, David et al
as 3:2018cv01057
Defendant:
Sheriff David Mahoney, DOC and Dane County Jail
Plaintiff:
Brandon Phillip Stull
Undetermined:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holifield v. Dohms et al
as 2:2018cv00807
Plaintiff:
Al Holifield
Defendant:
Warden Dohms, Cathy Jess, Jim Schwochert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Ziggler et al
as 2:2018cv00549
Plaintiff:
Larry H Dunn, Jr
Defendant:
Sgt Ziggler , CO Schwochert, Office of Secretary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weiss v. Shurpit et al
as 1:2018cv00318
Plaintiff:
Mark A Weiss
Defendant:
P Shurpit , DOC Food Service Administration Office and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strong v. Corrigan et al
as 2:2017cv01063
Plaintiff:
Dennis Strong
Defendant:
Chad Corrigan and State of Wisconsin DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeBauche, David v. WI Dept. of Corrections, DOC et al
as 3:2017cv00524
Plaintiff:
David D. DeBauche
Defendant:
WI Dept. of Corrections, DOC , K. Anderson, Mashak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
