Cases 31 - 40 of 197
Cantu v. Tapestry, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01974
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cantu
Defendant:
Tapestry, Inc. a Maryland corporation doing business as Coach.com and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 pa Right to Privacy Act
Cantu v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 3:2022cv01971
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cantu
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hunthausen v. Spine Media, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01970
Plaintiff:
Drew Hunthausen
Defendant:
Spine Media, LLC and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cantu v. Dealer Dot Com, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01938
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cantu
Defendant:
Dealer Dot Com, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Dealer.com and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jessie Cantu v. Hallmark Cards, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv08473
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cantu
Defendant:
Hallmark Cards, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jesse Cantu v. WW.com, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv07977
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cantu
Defendant:
WW.com, LLC, WW INTERNATIONAL INC., Does 1 through 25, Inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Darren Clevenger, et al v. Welch Foods, Inc., et al
as 22-80110
Respondent:
DARREN CLEVENGER and DAVID BLOOM, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
WELCH FOODS, INC., a Cooperative, THE PROMOTION IN MOTION COMPANIES, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 25
Koi Design LLC, et al v. Marron Lawyers, APC, et alIn re: Koi Design LLC, et al v. Marron Lawyers, APC, et al
as 22-55839
Debtor:
In the Matter of: KOI DESIGN LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOI DESIGN LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
MARRON LAWYERS, APC
Defendant:
A. DOUGLAS MASTROIANNI, DBA Mastroianni Law Firm, BLOOM FIRM, APC and DOES, 1 through 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
California Coastal Commission v. North County Transit District et al
as 3:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
California Coastal Commission
Defendant:
North County Transit District, Does 1 through 25, Exbon Devlopment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101 Interstate Commerce Act-Interstate Transportation Rail
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
