Cases 51 - 55 of 55
AL-ZAHRANI v. DONALD RUMSFELD, et al
as 1:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
TALAL AL-ZAHRANI, TALAL AL-ZAHRANI, ALI ABDULLAH AHMED AL-SALAMI and others
Defendant:
DONALD RUMSFELD, RICHARD MYERS, PETER PACE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LOPEZ et al v. COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv01989
Plaintiff:
RENE ARTURO LOPEZ, AQUILLA A.D. TURNER, MOHAMMED BARAKATULLAH ABDUSSALAAM and others
Defendant:
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS ACTION NETWORK, INC., JOHN DOE COMPANIES 1-50, ZAHARA INVESTMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ALLAITHI v. RUMSFELD et al
as 1:2008cv01677
Plaintiff:
SAMI ABDULAZIZ ALLAITHI
Defendant:
DONALD RUMSFELD, RICHARD MYERS, JAMES T. HILL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FESER v. AU OPTRONICS CORP. et al
as 1:2007cv00424
Plaintiff:
GAIL FESER
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORP., AU OPTRONICS CORP. AMERICA, CHI MEIOPTO ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 25 Clayton Act
Roth, Pamela, et al v. King, Rufus, et al
as 05-7060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Pamela H. Roth, David J. Sitomer, David Jay Ontell, On behalf of themselves and all other attorneys similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rufus G. King, III, as Chief Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Lee F. Satterfield, As Chief Judge of the Family Court of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Anita Josey-Herring, As Deputy Chief Judge of the Family Court of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Ronald Sullivan, as Director of the Public Defender Service of the District of Columbia
Defendant - Appellee:
Herb Robinson, as Director of the Office of Administration for the Criminal Justice Act and Does, 1-100
Appellee - Appellee:
Avis E. Buchanan, as Director of the Public Defender Service of the District of Columbia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
