Cases 1 - 10 of 33
South Dakota Board of Regents v. Discount Seeds, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv04115
Defendant:
Discount Seeds, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Plaintiff:
South Dakota Board of Regents
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321
Lundahl et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 5:2017cv05069
Plaintiff:
Logan Lundahl and Holli Lundahl
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Michele M Christiansen, Mary Corporon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Windsor v. Snap et al
as 4:2015mc00098
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Defendant:
Ginger Snap, Yappy, Ollie Reader and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Windsor v. Snap et al
as 4:2015cv04118
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Defendant:
Ginger Snap, Yappy, Ollie Reader and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lytle v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2013cv05083
Plaintiff:
Larry Lytle
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services , Food and Drug Administration , Tyra Wisecup and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NDSU Research Foundation v. Sexauer Discount Farm Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv04115
Plaintiff:
NDSU Research Foundation
Defendant:
Sexauer Discount Farm Services, Inc. , Jeff Muckey and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321
UNL Technology Development Corporation et al v. Christensen
as 4:2011cv04120
Plaintiff:
UNL Technology Development Corporation and Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska
Defendant:
Chris Christensen and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321
UNL Technology Development Corporation et al v. Christensen
as 3:2012cv03027
Plaintiff:
UNL Technology Development Corporation and Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska
Defendant:
Chris Christensen and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321
Imperial Enterprises, Inc. v. Does 1-3,145
as 4:2011mc00055
Plaintiff:
Imperial Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-3,145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
