Cases 1 - 10 of 1,063
Petro v. Bohannon et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kristen Justice Petro
Defendant:
Justin Bohannon, John Doe Holbrooks and Image Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Minton v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Robert Minton
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Police Department, Officer Balmore Cruz and others
Calhoun v. Lamb et al
as 1:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Ansley Calhoun
Defendant:
Almatin Lamb, Jamal Mustafa, Gregory Tillman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Cordero Riley
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olah v. Cobb County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
Joseph Olah
Defendant:
Cobb County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Craig Owens and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love v. Kirby et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Love
Defendant:
Dane Kirby, Sgt. Kacy Godsey, Sgt. Katie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAH et al v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
VIRAJ SHAH, SATISHKUMAR PATEL, SHIVSENA GAMING LLC and others
Defendant:
GREG COUNTRYMAN, STACEY JACKSON, DAVID COOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boswell v. Floyd County et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Chris Boswell
Defendant:
Floyd County, Floyd County Police, Misty Pledger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
