Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 16 of 16
WELCH v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv08745
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER WELCH
Defendant: CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER HEALTHCARE PROVIDER/CONTRACTOR, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONKLIN v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv07169
Plaintiff: MICHAEL CONKLIN
Defendant: CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, LOMBARDO, SHERIFF CAPTAINS JANE/JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Strayhorn et al
as 3:2014cv01665
Plaintiff: Toney A. White, III
Defendant: D. Strayhorn, J. Cariman, Daniel Paramo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delmo Torrefranca v. William Suter, et al
as 11-15216
Plaintiff - Appellant: DELMO FIGURA TORREFRANCA, AKA Delmo F. Torrefranca
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM K. SUTER, Clerk of the Court, U.S. Supreme Court, ERIK A. FOSSUM, Deputy Clerk, U.S. Supreme Court, CATHY A. CATTERSON, Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals and others
Delmo Torrefranca v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 10-17312
Plaintiff - Appellant: DELMO FIGURA TORREFRANCA
Defendant - Appellee: DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director of Arizona Department of Correction (ADC) at ADC, TERRY L. GODDARD, Attorney General at Attorney General Office, RANDALL M. HOWE, Chief Counsel at Criminal Appeals Section and others
Delmo Torrefranca v. Terry Goddard, et al
as 10-16192
Plaintiff - Appellant: DELMO FIGURA TORREFRANCA
Defendant - Appellee: TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General at Attorney General Office, RANDALL M. HOWE, Chief Counsel at Criminal Appeals Section, RICHARD M. ROMLEY, Maricopa County Attorney at Maricopa County Attorney's Office and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?