Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Virginia Murguia v. Jacquelyn Hernandez et al
as 2:2019cv10531
Plaintiff:
Virginia Murguia
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Hernandez, Law Office of Craig A. Darling, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09799
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roberta Daprea v. Ford Motor Company
as 8:2019cv02132
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Roberta Daprea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan et al
as 2:2019cv08177
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive and ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
Plaintiff:
Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Harold Pick v. James A. Kay, et al
as 2:2019cv07137
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc., James A. Kay, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Pick, Wireless US, LC and Jay Francis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
M A-COM Technology Solutions Inc. et al v. Litrinium, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00220
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Jerome Garez and Litrinium, Inc.
Plaintiff:
M/A-COM Technology Solutions, Inc., Mindspeed Technologies, S.A.S. and M A-COM Technology Solutions Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.