Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CREAMER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv01874
Plaintiff:
Karen Creamer, Jane Dalen, Mary Moody and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Mayor MURIEL BOWSER, DC HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRENADIER v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL (WFB) ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2022cv00743
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TALBOT v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE TALBOT
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DC HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Religion
CIMA v. JOHN DOES 1-20 et al
as 1:2020cv03486
Defendant:
John Does 41-60, JOHN DOES 1-20, John Does 21-40 and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'CONNOR V. ADAMS et al
as 1:2020cv00721
Plaintiff:
O'CONNOR and CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Defendant:
ADAMS, PATRICIA HANDY PLACE FOR WOMEN, ACTING DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'CONNOR v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2019cv03642
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20, GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, LAURA ZEILINGER and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 790
GASKIN et al v. MAY et al
as 1:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
SEAN GASKIN , JOHN SCANTLEBURY and FREDERICK CHRISTOPHER HAWKESWORTH
Defendant:
STEPHEN MAY, GORDON PATTEN, JR, JODI I AVERGUN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BRODT v. COUNTY OF HARFORD et al
as 1:2013cv01756
Plaintiff:
RONALD HOWARD BRODT, SR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HARFORD, HARFORD COUNTY DISTRICT COURT , HARFORD COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
