Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Waseem Daker v. Macon SP Warden, et al
as 18-13323
Movant - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MACON SP WARDEN, RICKY MYRICK, Director of Investigation and Compliance Inmate Affairs, Macon State Prison, LISA FOUNTAIN, Interim Manager of Inmate Affairs Unit, Macon State Prison and others
Darnell Nolley v. Macon SP Warden, et al
as 18-11668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MACON SP WARDEN, RICKY MYRICK, Director of Investigations and Compliance Inmate Affairs, Macon State Prison, LISA FOUNTAIN, Interim Manager of Inmate Affairs Unit, Macon State Prison and others
Waseem Daker v. Gregory McLaughlin, et al
as 17-14971
Movant - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, TREVONZA BOBBITT, KENDRICK WILKINSON and others
Waseem Daker v. Gregory McLaughlin, et al
as 17-14972
Movant - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, TREVONZA BOBBITT, KENDRICK WILKINSON and others
Waseem Daker v. Gregory McLaughlin, et al
as 17-14158
Movant - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, RICKY MYRICK, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Darnell Nolley v. Macon SP Warden, et al
as 16-16102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MACON SP WARDEN, RICKY MYRICK, Director of Investigations andCompliance Inmate Affairs, Macon State Prison, LISA FOUNTAIN, Interim Manager of Inmate Affairs Unit, Macon State Prison and others
RUFFIN v. OWENS et al
as 5:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
DERON J RUFFIN
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, CYNTHIA NELSON, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOLLEY v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, RICKY MYRICK, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADDOX v. OWENS et al
as 5:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M MADDOX
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, TREVONZA BOBBITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
