Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Wisconsin Voter Alliance et al v. Millis et al
as 1:2023cv01416
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Voter Alliance, Ron Heuer and Kenneth Brown
Defendant:
Don M. Millis, Robert F. Spindell, Jr., Marge Bostelmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liebert, Susan et al v. Wisconsin Elections Commission et al
as 3:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Susan Liebert, Anna Haas, Anna Poi and others
Defendant:
Wisconsin Elections Commission, Don M. Millis, Robert F. Spindell and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee and Republican Party Of Wisconsin
Amicus Curiae:
Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frank et al v. Walker et al
as 3:2020cv00768
Plaintiff:
Shirley Brown, Sarah Lahti, Nancy Lea Wilde and others
Defendant:
Thomas Cane, Mark L. Thomsen, Beverly R Gill and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States Justice Foundation, Matthew Augustine, Erin M Decker and others
Intervenor Defendant:
The Wisconsin Legislature
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruthelle Frank, et al v. Scott Walker, et al
as 16-3003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RUTHELLE FRANK, JUSTIN LUFT, DARTRIC DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SCOTT WALKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Wisconsin, MARK L. THOMSEN, ANN S. JACOBS and others
Arrington, et al v. Elections Board, et al
as 2:2001cv00121
Plaintiff:
Rev Olen Arrington, Jr, Alvin Baldus, Stephen H Braunginn and others
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Elections Board, John P Savage, David Halbrooks and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
James R Baumgart, Roger M Breske, Brian T Burke and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Scott R Jensen and Mary E Panzer
Amicus Curiae:
Leon Young, Annette Polly Williams, Hon Frederick Kessler and others
Interested Party:
Wisconsin Government Accountability Board
Petitioner:
Janine P Geske
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
