Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Arizona Democratic Party, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al
as 20-16766
Defendant:
DAVID STEVENS, in his official capacity as Cochise County Recorder, SHARIE MILHEIRO, in her official capacity as Greenlee County Recorder, KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DSCC, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE and ARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Amicus Curiae:
RUSSELL BOWERS, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, KAREN FANN, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, STATE OF ALABAMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and others
Arizona Democratic Party, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al
as 20-16759
Defendant:
DAVID STEVENS, in his official capacity as Cochise County Recorder, SHARIE MILHEIRO, in her official capacity as Greenlee County Recorder, KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DSCC, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE and ARIZONA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Amicus Curiae:
RUSSELL BOWERS, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, KAREN FANN, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, STATE OF ALABAMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and others
Madeline Pavek, et al v. Steve Simon
as 20-2814
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DSCC, Madeline Pavek, Ethan Sykes and others
Not Yet Classified:
National Republican Congressional Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Republican National Committee and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Simon, In his official capacity as the Minnesota Secretary of State
Madeline Pavek, et al v. Donald Trump for President, et al
as 20-2410
Not Yet Classified:
National Republican Congressional Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Republican National Committee and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Madeline Pavek, DSCC, Ethan Sykes and others
Defendant:
Steve Simon, In his official capacity as the Minnesota Secretary of State
Appellant:
Honest Elections Project, State of Texas, State of West Virginia and others
Dan Pederson, et al v. Donald J. Trump for President,
as 20-2239
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dan Pederson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Shell Wheeler, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Connor Olson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., a principal campaign committee
Diller v. Donald J. Trump For President, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01079
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump For President, Inc. and Republican National Committee
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Diller
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
DE LA FUENTE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv03753
Defendant:
Arizona Republican Party, Georgia Republican Party, Washington Republican Party and others
Plaintiff:
ROQUE DE LA FUENTE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pederson et al v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
as 0:2019cv02735
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shell Wheeler, Connor Olson and Dan Pederson
Jeffrey Koenig v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 19-17007
Petitioner:
DONALD J. TRUMP, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., JERRY GRIFFIN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX PADILLA, Secretary of State of California, in his official capacity and GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFFREY S. KOENIG
Donald J. Trump for President,, et al v. Alex Padilla
as 19-17002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his capacity as a private citizen and DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC.
Petitioner:
JEFFREY S. KOENIG and JERRY GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX PADILLA, Secretary of State of California, in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
