Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Kwane Dozier v. Central State Prison, et al
as 24-12210
Defendant:
CENTRAL STATE PRISON, DOOLY STATE PRISON and BALDWIN STATE PRISON
Plaintiff:
KWANE TYREE DOZIER
Kwane Dozier v. Central State Prison, et al
as 24-10997
Plaintiff:
KWANE TYREE DOZIER
Defendant:
CENTRAL STATE PRISON, DOOLY STATE PRISON and BALDWIN STATE PRISON
Marcus Terrell v. Warden Dooly State Prison, et al
as 24-10577
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL
Defendant:
WARDEN DOOLY STATE PRISON, PAUL, LUCAS and others
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON, et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, NURSE ARMSTRONG and NURSE ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry Gibson v. Dooly SP Warden, et al
as 24-10125
Plaintiff:
BARRY LYNN GIBSON
Defendant:
DOOLY SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN OF CARE AND TREATMENT AT DOOLY STATE PRISON, KENDRICK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, ARMSTRONG and ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Dooly State Prison et al
as 4:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Erik E. Pryor
Defendant:
Dooly State Prison, Ms. Armstrong and Ms. Altma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. DOOLY STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
ISSAC KING, JR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, JOHN OR JANE DOE, P A WOODARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOZIER v. CENTRAL STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
KWANE DOZIER
Defendant:
CENTRAL STATE PRISON, DOOLY STATE PRISON and BALDWIN STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
