Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Smith v. Waddington, et al
as 16-3046
Plaintiff - Appellant: BENNY R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: DOUGLAS WADDINGTON, Warden, in his individual capacity and TIM EASLEY, Deputy Warden, in his individual capacity
Smith v. Waddington, et al
as 15-3184
Plaintiff - Appellant: BENNY R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: DOUGLAS WADDINGTON, Warden, in his individual capacity and TIM EASLEY, Deputy Warden, in his individual capacity
Smith (ID 23865) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03186
Plaintiff: Benny R. Smith
Defendant: Douglas Waddington and Tim Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith (ID 23865) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03240
Plaintiff: Benny R. Smith
Defendant: Douglas Waddington and Tim Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03145
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03074
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Waddington, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3056
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER D. PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee: DOUGLAS WADDINGTON and KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03029
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03018
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Waddington et al
as 5:2015cv03002
Petitioner: Christopher Pierce
Respondent: Douglas Waddington and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?