Cases 1 - 10 of 388
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Drummond
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Thomas Allen Moore
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silsattanak v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Erik Silsattanak
Defendant:
The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, James Dzurenda, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faulkner v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Faulkner
Defendant:
The City Mayor Adams, Commissioner NYC Corrections, Deputy Commissioner NYC Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
Harry Garcia
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabalan v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cabalan
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meas v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jerry Meals
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
