Other Statutes Cases
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00558
Plaintiff: Galmi, Amram Galmi, Anchorage Police & Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Deborah Griffin, BBVA Securities, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Franklin Investors Securities Trust, Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Franklin Templeton Investment Funds and others
Petitioner: Waterford Township Police and Fire Retirement System, HMG Global Initiative Inc., TIAA and others
Consolidated Defendant: Shlomo Yanai, Yaacov "Kobi" Altman, Retirement and Relief System and others
Intervenor: United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff: Certain funds and accounts managed by TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC and Teachers Advisors LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC, TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC on behalf of certain of its managed funds and accounts and others
Cause Of Action: m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Advantage Behavioral Health Systems et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45249
Defendant: Allergan PLC, Allergan Finance LLC, Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Satilla Community Services doing business as Unison Behavioral Health, Georgia Mountains Community Services doing business as Avita Community Partners, Advantage Behavioral Health Systems and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
WestRock Services, LLC v. Sealey et al
as 2:2020cv00180
Defendant: Interstate Resources, Inc. doing business as DS Smith North America Packaging and Paper, Larry Heath Sealey
Plaintiff: WestRock Services, LLC
Advantage Behavioral Health Systems et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03442
Defendant: Allergan PLC, Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Allergan Finance, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Satilla Community Services doing business as Unison Behavioral Health, Georgia Mountains Community Services doing business as Avita Community Partners, Advantage Behavioral Health Systems and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OLYMPUS GROWTH FUND VI, L.P. et al
as 1:2020cv00464
Defendant: LIQUI-BOX, INC., DS SMITH PLC, OLYMPUS GROWTH FUND VI, L.P.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Hesham Ismail v. Interstate Resources Inc, et al
as 20-1291
Defendant / Appellee: DS SMITH HOLDINGS INC, (Successors to Interstate Resources), TDBA DS Smith Packaging Reading and Interstate Resources, TDBA DS Smith Reading Mill, TDBA United Corstack LLC, TDBA Interstate Recources, DS SMITH PLC, UNITED CORSTACK LLC, (Successors to Interstate Resources), TDBA DH Smith Reading Mill, TDBA Interstate Resources Inc and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HESHAM ISMAIL
Hesham Ismail v. Interstate Resources Inc, et alIn re: Hesham Ismail v. Interstate Resources Inc, et al
as 20-1287
Respondent: DS SMITH HOLDINGS INC, (Successors to Interstate Resources), TDBA DS Smith Packaging Reading and Interstate Resources, TDBA DS Smith Reading Mill, TDBA United Corstack LLC, TDBA Interstate Recources, INTERSTATE CONTAINER READING LLC, (Successors to Interstate Resources), TDBA DS Smith Reading Mill, TDBA Interstate Resources Inc, INTERSTATE RESOURCES INC and others
Petitioner: In re: HESHAM ISMAIL
Hesham Ismail v. DS Smith Holdings Inc, et al
as 19-2465
Defendant / Appellee: INTERSTATE CONTAINER READING LLC, TDBA DS Smith Packaging Reading and Interstate Resources, (Successor to Interstate Resources), UNITED CORSTACK LLC, TDBA DH Smith Reading Mill, and Interstae REsources (Successor to Interstate Resources), DS SMITH PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HESHAM ISMAIL
Newby v. Enron Corp, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-20043
Plaintiff - Appellant: FLEMING & ASSOCIATES LLP
Defendant - Appellee: ANDREW S FASTOW, BANK OF AMERICA CORP, CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?