Cases 1 - 8 of 8
VAN DYK v. CITY OF LONG BRANCH et al
as 3:2019cv16409
Defendant:
CITY OF LONG BRANCH, CHIEF JASON ROEBUCK and JOHN DOE ONE
Plaintiff:
JOHN VAN DYK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VAN DYK et al v. QUICKEN LOANS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05463
Plaintiff:
RONALD VAN DYK and JEAN VAN DYK
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. , MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENNETT v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2014cv02645
Plaintiff:
PAMELA T. BENNETT
Defendant:
HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY , DLW ENTERPRISES, INC. , THE VAN DYK GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
VOLANSKY et al v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2014cv02646
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. VOLANSKY and SANDRA VOLANSKY
Defendant:
HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY , DLW ENTERPRISES, INC. , THE VAN DYK GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
FAUST v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
CHERYL FAUST
Defendant:
HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY , NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY , DLW ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
CRUZ v. SETON HALL UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2011cv01429
Plaintiff:
JESSE CRUZ
Defendant:
SETON HALL UNIVERSITY , "ABC CORPS. 1-5, ALEXANDRA BAN DYK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
VAN DYK, JR. v. AMERIHEALTH OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv05129
Plaintiff:
JAMES J VAN DYK, JR.
Defendant:
AMERIHEALTH OF NEW JERSEY and ELM AUTO SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VAN DYK et al v. TARGET DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04008
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE VAN DYK and ROBERT VAN DYK
Defendant:
TARGET DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., TARGET CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
