Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Board of Trustees of the Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Arrow Electric Inc.
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 714, AFL-CIO, Board of Trustees of the Dakotas and Western Minnesota Apprenticeship Training Fund, Board of Trustees of the Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Arrow Electric Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 ERISA
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Western Edge Electric Inc.
as 3:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund, The, Dakotas Areawide IBEW-NECA Savings and Retirement Plan, The, Dakotas Area Electrical Apprenticeship and Training Fund, The and others
Defendant:
Western Edge Electric Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 ERISA - Employee Benefits
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Wiggins Computing, LLC
as 3:2023cv50072
Plaintiff:
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund and Dakotas Areawide IBEW-NECA Savings and Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Wiggins Computing, LLC d/b/a WCT Midwest and Wiggins Computing, LLC doing business as WCT Midwest
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund et al v. E&I Global Energy Services, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund , Dakotas Areawide IBEW-NECA Savings & Retirement Plan , Dakotas Area Electrical Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
E&I Global Energy Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Bruce Hoffman Electric LLC
as 3:2016cv00359
Defendant:
Bruce Hoffman Electric LLC
Plaintiff:
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund and Dakotas Areawide IBEW-NECA Savings & Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dakotas and Western Minnesota v. First Agency, Inc., et al
as 16-3375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund, by Randy Stainbrook and Edward Christian, in their representative capacity as Trustees, and each of their successors
Defendant - Appellee:
First Agency, Inc. and Guarantee Trust Life Insurance Company
Dakotas and Western Minnesota v. First Agency, Inc., et al
as 16-3319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund, by Randy Stainbrook and Edward Christian, in their representative capacity as Trustees, and each of their successors
Defendant - Appellant:
First Agency, Inc. and Guarantee Trust Life Insurance Company
Dakotas and Western Minnesota v. First Agency, Inc., et al
as 16-1846
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund, by Randy Stainbrook and Edward Christian, in their representative capacity as Trustees, and each of their successors
Defendant - Appellant:
First Agency, Inc. and Guarantee Trust Life Insurance Company
IBEW-NECA Retirement Plan, Trustees of et al v. Schaefer Electric, LLC
as 2:2016cv04106
Plaintiff:
IBEW-NECA Retirement Plan , Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund , IBEW-NECA Joint Apprenticeship and Training Trust and others
Defendant:
Schaefer Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund v. First Agency, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
First Agency, Inc. and Guarantee Trust Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 ERISA - Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
