Cases 11 - 20 of 436
Torres v. Artus
as 18-1008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Armando Torres
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent Dale Artus, Wende Correctional Facility Thomas Sticht, Deputy Superintendent of Security, Alan Herdzik, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
Virginia Bluff, John Lascala, Social Worker, Jeffrey Mayer and others
Nunez v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B. Nunez
Defendant:
The State of New York, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bludson v. Artus
as 9:2018cv00093
Petitioner:
Donnell Bludson
Respondent:
Dale Artus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimenez v. Artus
as 1:2018cv00533
Plaintiff:
Ivan J. Jimenez
Defendant:
Superintendent Dale Artus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theall v. Artus
as 9:2017cv01333
Plaintiff:
Adam Theall
Defendant:
Dale Artus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lashway v. Fisher
as 17-3828
Defendant:
David Post, Senior Corrections Counselor at Wende Correctional Facility, Zimmerman, Employee Assistant at Wende Correctional Facility, Jaquline Levitt, Doctor at Wende Correctional Facility and others
Appellee:
Stephen Dudek, Correctional Officer at Wende Correctional Facility, Fredrick Kintzel, Sergeant at Wende Correctional Facility, Angel Mendez, Correctional Officer at Wende Correctional Facility and others
Appellant:
Steven A. Lashway
Theall v. Artus
as 9:2017cv01185
Petitioner:
Adam Theall
Respondent:
Dale Artus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Artus
as 2:2017cv06187
Respondent:
Dale Artus
Petitioner:
Shiroide Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Artus
as 1:2017cv07032
Petitioner:
Lloyd Nelson Jones
Respondent:
Dale Artus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
