Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00510
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
Jeremy Reese v. Stafeny Shearwood, et al
as 16-11352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY DALE REESE, also known as Monster
Defendant - Appellee:
STAFENY SHEARWOOD, Head Nurse, Tom Green County Jail, Individual and Official Capacity, THOMAS FREEDEN, Doctor, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Individual and Official Capacity, SANDRA LNU, Case Manager, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Reese v. Shearwood et al
as 6:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dale Reese
Defendant:
Stafeny Shearwood, Thomas Freeden, Sandra LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dugger v. Tom Green County Jail et al
as 6:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Clifford W Dugger
Defendant:
Tom Green County Jail, David Jones, Dale Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Chavez v. David Jones, et al
as 13-11258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LUNA CHAVEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EARL JONES, Sheriff, DALE PEARCE, Chief Deputy, TODD ALLEN, Captain, Jail Commander and others
Davis v. Pearce et al
as 6:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
James Wayne Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Dale Pearce, Head Nurse Kathy LNU, Todd Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, Jr v. Tom Green County Jail et al
as 6:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
James Wayne Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Tom Green County Jail, Kathy Halfman, Todd Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoyt v. Hicks et al
as 6:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Clifton C Hoyt
Defendant:
Officer Hicks, Charlene LNU, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Jones et al
as 6:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Richard Luna Chavez
Defendant:
David Jones, Dale Pearce, Todd Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
