Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2017cv03035
Plaintiff:
James Dale Williams
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Harris County Commisioners, Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Unimark Truck Transport, LLC
as 2:2017cv00018
Defendant:
Unimark Truck Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Dale Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Doty et al
as 7:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Larry Dale Williams
Defendant:
Lawrence Doty, Richard Wathen, Tommy Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bliss et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03966
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bliss , Olly Cantell , Danielle Carter and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson and Johnson Services Inc , Thomas P Schmalried M D A Professional Corporation and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Williams v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02021
Plaintiff:
Dale Williams
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , Depuy Products, Inc. and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. CTC, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv01496
Defendant:
CTC, Inc. and Larry Foster
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Dale Williams, Patsy Breland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Williams v. Leonard et al
as 3:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dale Williams
Defendant:
Gean Leonard, Michael Henson, Sgt. Fahrino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00141
Petitioner:
Harvey Dale Williams
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
