Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Som v. The Board of Trustees of the Natchez Regional Medical Center et al
as 5:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Santanu Som
Defendant:
The Board of Trustees of the Natchez Regional Medical Center, The Natchez Regional Medical Center, Lana Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daly v. Provident Advertising and Marketing, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Allison Miller
Defendant:
Provident Advertising and Marketing, Inc. , Provident Management Corporation, Inc. , Hooters Incorporated and others
Movant:
John Daly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daly v. Daugherty et al
as 3:2010cv00299
Plaintiff:
Barrett B. Daly
Defendant:
Betty Daugherty, Henry M. Glaze, Jr., Adam Kilgore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexis et al v. Mississippi Windstorm Underwriters Association et al
as 1:2009cv00207
Plaintiff:
Anthony Alexis, Sonja Alexis, Cassie Babin and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Windstorm Underwriters Association, Audubon Insurance Company, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Body v. Victoria Select Insurance Company et al
as 3:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
Edna F. Body
Defendant:
Victoria Select Insurance Company, Victoria Select Insurance Company, Michael Daly Agency, Incorporated and others
Counter Claimant:
Victoria Select Insurance Company, Victoria Select Insurance Company, Michael Daly Agency, Incorporated and others
Counter Defendant:
Edna F. Body
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
The Mississippi Bar v. Daly
as 3:2007mc00012
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Defendant:
Barrett B. Daly
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
