Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SCHALALBEO v. DAMCO DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
ANGELA SCHALALBEO
Cross Defendant:
DAMCO DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC., THE MAERSK GROUP, MAERSK and others
Defendant:
MSC, MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO. USA, HERCULES CHASSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jackson v. Damco Distribution Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jackson
Defendant:
Damco Distribution Services, Inc. doing business as HUDD Transportation and Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Ace American Insurance Company
Jackson v. Damco Distribution Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jackson
Defendant:
Damco Distribution Services, Inc. doing business as HUDD Transportation and Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Ace American Insurance Company
Jackson v. Damco Distribution Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04042
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jackson
Defendant:
Damco Distribution Services, Inc. doing business as HUDD Transportation and Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc.
Leonard Earl Shackelford v. Simplified Labor Staffing Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06846
Plaintiff:
Leonard Earl Shackelford
Defendant:
Simplified Labor Staffing Solutions, Inc., Damco Distribution Services Inc., Does 1 through 50, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
William Fox v. Damco Distribution Services Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04543
Defendant:
William Peratt, Damco Distribution Services Inc., Does 1-100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
William Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Cooke v. Damco Distribution Services Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08094
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooke
Defendant:
Damco Distribution Services Inc. and Does
Eloy Paulino v. Macy's Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04854
Defendant:
Damco Distribution Services Inc., Does, Macy's Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eloy Paulino
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
