Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Ruiz-Bowers, Alexi v. Wisconsin Dane County Jail
as 3:2017cv00571
Plaintiff:
Alexi Valentin Ruiz-Bowers
Defendant:
Wisconsin Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier, Daymon v. Wisconsin Dane County Jail
as 3:2017cv00572
Plaintiff:
Daymon J. Frazier
Defendant:
Wisconsin Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown, Richard v. Dane County Jail
as 3:2017cv00488
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Brown
Defendant:
Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyche, Dana v. Wisconsin, et al.
as 3:2017cv00482
Plaintiff:
Dana Hyche
Defendant:
Wisconsin and Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darreyll Thomas v. Michael Reese, et al
as 17-1742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREYLL T. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL REESE, Deputy, ROBIN HAMPTON, Deputy, ROB VAN NORMAN, Deputy and others
Shields v. Dane County Jail Mental Health Dept et al
as 3:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Cortez Willie Shields
Defendant:
Dane County Jail Mental Health Dept, Mental Health Director, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shields v. Dane County Jail Mental Health Dept et al
as 2:2017cv00247
Plaintiff:
Cortez Willie Shields
Defendant:
Dane County Jail Mental Health Dept, Mental Health Director, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haff, Wayne v. Mahoney, David et al
as 3:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Haff
Defendant:
David Mahoney and Others in control of the Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilman, Mark v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Gilman
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Dane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson Ragland, Clint v. Dane County Jail et al
as 3:2016cv00751
Plaintiff:
Clint Abraham Wilson Ragland
Defendant:
Dane County Jail, Jose Pacheco, John Gnacinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
