Cases 1 - 10 of 698
Newkirk v. Wong et al
as 3:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Newkirk, Jr.
Defendant:
Danielle Wong, Paul Hammick, Zackary Klomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Danny Dermill Daniels, Kariem Quadir Muhammud, James Jamuel Daniels and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Officer, City of Denver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilley v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Dane Daniel Tilley
Defendant:
Scott Semple, P. Pelzar, L. Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Stephen Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Raeshon Kenneth Daniels
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept. of Correction, Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Stephen Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Candella v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Daniel Candella
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mazzacane v. Osborne Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mazzacane
Defendant:
Osborne Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
