Cases 1 - 10 of 15
b1Bank v. Aquila Aviation Ventures, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
b1Bank
Defendant:
Aquila Aviation Ventures, LLC, UltraAir, LLC, Mente Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
MidFirst Bank v. Joseph-White
as 4:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
MidFirst Bank
Defendant:
Danielle Joseph-White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02488
Plaintiff:
Willie Jones, Ellen D Dotson, Cheryl B Manning and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grant v. Jackson et al
as 9:2020cv00188
Defendant:
David B Lee, Michael L Herrington, Leroy Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernal v. Foster et al
as 3:2019cv01321
Defendant:
Clarence Foster, III and Daniel R White
Plaintiff:
Victor Bernal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCray v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv01157
Plaintiff:
Robert Harley McCray
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Bryan Collier, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Artavias T Edwards
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Bennie J Coleman, Rebecca A Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. USA
as 1:2015cv00113
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Robert White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
White v. United States of America DO NOT DOCKET IN . CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 2:14cv483.
as 2:2015cv00006
Petitioner:
Daniel Robert White
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv00483
Petitioner:
Daniel Robert White
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
