Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dydzak v. Chen et al
as 3:2017cv06843
Defendant:
Jeffrey L. Bleich, Carlos T. Bea, A. Wallace Tashima and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dydzak v. United States of America et al
as 4:2017cv04360
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Defendant:
United States of America, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, Matthew C. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Daniel D. Dydzak v. Richard Alexander et al
as 2:2016cv02915
Defendant:
Richard Alexander, Judge Andre Birotte, Jr, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Daniel Dydzak v. State Bar of California, et al
as 11-55143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL D. DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, STATE BAR COURT and others
Defendant:
RONALD M. GEORGE, Administrative Law Judge, CARLOS R. MORENO, JOYCE L. KENNARD and others
In re: Daniel David Dydzak, Esq.
as 10-80193
Respondent:
In re: DANIEL D. DYDZAK, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: August 9, 2004,
Daniel Dydzak v. Joann Remke, et al
as 10-56000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL D. DYDZAK, AKA Daniel David Dydzak
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANN M. REMKE, DONALD F. MILES, THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Joann Remke, et al
as 10-55772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL D. DYDZAK, AKA Daniel David Dydzak
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANN M. REMKE, DONALD F. MILES, THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and others
Daniel Dydzak v. State of California, et al
as 09-56325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL D. DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE FOUNDATION OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and others
Daniel D. Dydzak v. State of California et al
as 2:2008cv07765
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Defendant:
State of California, The State Bar of California, The Foundation of the State Bar of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
