Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Patel v. Martuscello
as 16-3020
Petitioner - Appellant:
Vinod Patel
Respondent - Appellee:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Lancaster v. Martuscello
as 9:2016cv00166
Petitioner:
William Lancaster
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sandy v. Martuscello
as 1:2016cv00421
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Petitioner:
Kester Andre Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sandy v. Martuscello
as 9:2015cv01501
Petitioner:
Kester Andre Sandy
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burns v. Fischer
as 15-1631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Burns
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr., Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Captain Shanley, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Sergeant Noeh, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and others
Barksdale v. Annucci et al
as 9:2015cv00560
Plaintiff:
Wayne Barksdale
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Carl Koenigsmann, Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanabria v. Martuscello
as 1:2015cv01705
Petitioner:
Eric Sanabria
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanabria v. Martuscello
as 1:2015cv01534
Petitioner:
Eric Sanabria
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Martuscello, Jr.
as 1:2014cv07458
Petitioner:
Anthony Walker
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Wildermuth
as 14-688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aurel Smith
Defendant:
B. White, Supervisor, Inmate Grievance Program, Upstate Correctional Facility
Defendant - Appellee:
M. Wildermuth, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, N. Ensel, Correctional Officer, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, C. Hale and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
