Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dampeer v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02957
Plaintiff: Monique Dampeer
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Erleen Banks, Daniel Johnson and others
Johnson v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10843
Plaintiff: Danielle Johnson
Defendant: Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. WalMart, Inc.
as 1:2023cv07579
Plaintiff: Danielle Johnson
Defendant: WALMART INC. and WalMart, Inc. a Foreign Corporation doing business as Walmart Supercenter #2817
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Aon plc v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv05059
Plaintiff: Aon plc
Defendant: Josh Thompson, Daniel Johnson, Annette Nitti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Johnson v. Davis
as 1:2019cv04252
Plaintiff: James Daniel Johnson
Defendant: Barbera A Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Walsh et al
as 1:2019cv03774
Plaintiff: James Daniel Johnson
Defendant: Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00558
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Plaintiff: Daniel Johnson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Samuels v. Pro Health General Surgery et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01281
Defendant: Richard Ninters, Pro Health General Surgery, Danielle Johnson and others
Plaintiff: James A. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv04074
Plaintiff: James Daniel Johnson
Defendant: Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle and Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv01976
Plaintiff: James Daniel Johnson
Defendant: Thomas Dart and Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?