Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Daniel Rittner, Sr. v. Jesse Williams, et al
as 19-3402
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SCHAUBLIN, Assistant Warden, K. WILLIAMS, Chronic Care Scheduler, D. HALL, Victim Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL L. RITTNER, SR.
Rittner v. Bartlet et al
as 3:2017cv01974
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Rittner
Defendant:
Melissa Bartlet, Crystal Ester, David Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rittner v. Simpson et al
as 3:2017cv01903
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Rittner, Sr.
Defendant:
Kandice Simpson, Shawn Wakefield and other unknown officers, agents, servants, employee, attorneys or attorneys representing defendants and those persons in active participation with them
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rittner v. Perez et al
as 3:2017cv01862
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Rittner, Sr.
Defendant:
Carlos A. Perez, Shannon Cole, John Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rittner v. Laws et al
as 3:2017cv01105
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Rittner, Sr.
Defendant:
Latisha Laws and Other unknown officers, agents, servants, employee, attorneys or attorneys representing defendants and those persons in active participation with them
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Rittner, Sr. v. Jesse Williams, et al
as 16-3397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL L. RITTNER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE J. WILLIAMS, Warden, JOHN COLEMAN, Warden, KEVIN JONES, Warden and others
Daniel Rittner, Sr. v. Jesse Williams, et al
as 13-4099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL L. RITTNER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE J. WILLIAMS, Warden, Warden, JOHN COLEMAN, Warden, Warden, KEVIN JONES, Warden and others
Rittner v. Williams et al
as 3:2013cv01345
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Rittner, Sr.
Defendant:
Jesse Williams, John Coleman, Kevin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Daniel Rittner, Sr.
as 12-4123
Movant:
In re: DANIEL L. RITTNER, SR.
Respondent:
JESSE WILLIAMS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
